IMPLICATIONS OF THE UNDERLYING ASSUMPTIONS OF PERT
- 1 October 1971
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Decision Sciences
- Vol. 2 (4) , 461-480
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.1971.tb00895.x
Abstract
PERT, as an aid in planning for project managers, has been widely accepted, but as yet there appears to be a wide gap between the user's apparent impression of the underlying assumptions and the theoretical assumptions. This paper points out some of the more common misconceptions and their implications upon the total project. The Beta distribution as the underlying probability distribution is evaluated as to first, the overall effects of the inherent errors that are imposed by the basic PERT assumptions, and second, the effects, from a probability distribution viewpoint, of some of the more common PERT misconceptions. Finally, several alternatives to the basic PERT methodology are explored, both from the theoretical and practical viewpoints.Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Use of the Compound Poisson in PertManagement Science, 1969
- Judgment Estimates of the Moments of Pert Type DistributionsManagement Science, 1968
- On the Expected Duration of PERT Type NetworksManagement Science, 1967
- Bias in Pert Project Completion Time Calculations for a Real NetworkManagement Science, 1966
- A Statistical Theory for PERT Critical Path AnalysisManagement Science, 1966
- The Estimation of the Mean and Variance of a “PERT” Activity TimeOperations Research, 1965
- Letter to the Editor—A Modification of Fulkerson's PERT AlgorithmOperations Research, 1964
- An Analytical Study of the PERT AssumptionsOperations Research, 1964
- Expected Critical Path Lengths in PERT NetworksOperations Research, 1962
- Application of a Technique for Research and Development Program EvaluationOperations Research, 1959