More Evidence in Favor of Three-Option Multiple-Choice Tests
- 1 September 1993
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Educational and Psychological Measurement
- Vol. 53 (3) , 771-778
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164493053003021
Abstract
Students from two consecutive semesters were given multiple-choice tests over five units of an undergraduate course in psychology. During the first semester, students were given five 50-question 4-option multiple-choice tests, and during the second semester students were given five 50-question 3-option multiple-choice tests. One-hundred and forty-four (57.6%) of the questions were identical between semesters except for second semester test items having only 3 options. Results indicate that students performed significantly better on 3-option items than on 4-option items (corrected for chance guessing), and that this improvement may be due to improved validity of the test items.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- What's Wrong with Three-Option Multiple Choice Items?Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1987
- OPTIMAL NUMBER OF CHOICES PER ITEM— A COMPARISON OF FOUR APPROACHES*Journal of Educational Measurement, 1977
- THE NUMBER OF ALTERNATIVES FOR OPTIMUM TEST RELIABILITYJournal of Educational Measurement, 1975
- The Reliability, Discrimination and Difficulty of Word-Knowledge Tests Employing Multiple Choice Items Containing Three, Four, or Five AlternativesAustralian Journal of Education, 1973
- Three-Choice Versus Four-Choice Items: Implications for Reliability and Validity Of Objective Achievement TestsEducational and Psychological Measurement, 1972
- The Optimal Number of Alternatives in Multiple-Choice Achievement Tests: Some Empirical Evidence for a Mathematical ProofEducational and Psychological Measurement, 1970
- Expected Reliability as a Function of Choices Per ItemEducational and Psychological Measurement, 1969
- The Effects of Guessing On the Standard Error of Measurement and the Reliability of Test ScoresEducational and Psychological Measurement, 1965
- A comparison of five types of objective tests in elementary psychology.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1928
- Comparative Reliabilities of Five Types of Objective Examinations.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1925