Age differences in response time to verbal and symbolic traffic signs
- 1 December 1984
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Experimental Aging Research
- Vol. 10 (4) , 201-204
- https://doi.org/10.1080/03610738408258465
Abstract
It is well established that verbal skills are maintained at a high level into old age while visuo-spatial skills begin to decline at an earlier age. It was hypothesized that the elderly would therefore respond more quickly to verbal traffic signs than to symbolic ones. In a test of this hypothesis, response times (RT's) to symbolic and verbal traffic signs were obtained from subjects in two age groups (19–29 and 65–77 years). While the elderly responded more slowly than the young subjects, they were an average of .2 seconds quicker in response to verbal traffic signs than symbolic ones. There were no differences in RT for symbolic and verbal signs for the young subjects. It is clear that the impact of traffic signs changes on the elderly deserves more attention than it is currently being given.This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Can age-related deficits in spatial memory be attenuated through the use of verbal coding?Experimental Aging Research, 1983
- Rapid Comprehension of Verbal and Symbolic Traffic Sign MessagesHuman Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 1979
- Reaction Time as an Index of Traffic Sign PerceptionHuman Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 1976
- The effect of age on the speed of sentence formation and incidetal learningExperimental Aging Research, 1976
- Age and Sex Differences in the Processing of Verbal and Nonverbal StimuliJournal of Gerontology, 1974
- Retention of visual and name codes of single letters.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1969
- Chronometric analysis of classification.Psychological Review, 1967