Mining sequence annotation databanks for association patterns
Open Access
- 1 November 2005
- journal article
- conference paper
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Bioinformatics
- Vol. 21 (Suppl_3) , iii49-iii57
- https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bti1206
Abstract
Motivation: Millions of protein sequences currently being deposited to sequence databanks will never be annotated manually. Similarity-based annotation generated by automatic software pipelines unavoidably contains spurious assignments due to the imperfection of bioinformatics methods. Examples of such annotation errors include over- and underpredictions caused by the use of fixed recognition thresholds and incorrect annotations caused by transitivity based information transfer to unrelated proteins or transfer of errors already accumulated in databases. One of the most difficult and timely challenges in bioinformatics is the development of intelligent systems aimed at improving the quality of automatically generated annotation. A possible approach to this problem is to detect anomalies in annotation items based on association rule mining. Results: We present the first large-scale analysis of association rules derived from two large protein annotation databases—Swiss-Prot and PEDANT—and reveal novel, previously unknown tendencies of rule strength distributions. Most of the rules are either very strong or very weak, with rules in the medium strength range being relatively infrequent. Based on dynamics of error correction in subsequent Swiss-Prot releases and on our own manual analysis we demonstrate that exceptions from strong rules are, indeed, significantly enriched in annotation errors and can be used to automatically flag them. We identify different strength dependencies of rules derived from different fields in Swiss-Prot. A compositional breakdown of association rules generated from PEDANT in terms of their constituent items indicates that most of the errors that can be corrected are related to gene functional roles. Swiss-Prot errors are usually caused by under-annotation owing to its conservative approach, whereas automatically generated PEDANT annotation suffers from over-annotation. Availability: All data generated in this study are available for download and browsing at . Contact:d.frishman@wzw.tum.de Supplementary information:Keywords
This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Universal Protein Resource (UniProt)Nucleic Acids Research, 2006
- Literature mining and database annotation of protein phosphorylation using a rule-based systemBioinformatics, 2005
- The FunCat, a functional annotation scheme for systematic classification of proteins from whole genomesNucleic Acids Research, 2004
- Improved Prediction of Signal Peptides: SignalP 3.0Journal of Molecular Biology, 2004
- Illuminating the Evolutionary History of ChlamydiaeScience, 2004
- Development and Evaluation of an Automated Annotation Pipeline and cDNA Annotation SystemGenome Research, 2003
- Domains, motifs and clusters in the protein universeCurrent Opinion in Chemical Biology, 2003
- Large-Scale Protein Annotation through Gene OntologyGenome Research, 2002
- Predicting transmembrane protein topology with a hidden markov model: application to complete genomes11Edited by F. CohenJournal of Molecular Biology, 2001
- Assessing annotation transfer for genomics: quantifying the relations between protein sequence, structure and function through traditional and probabilistic scoresJournal of Molecular Biology, 2000