Lamotrigine Monotherapy in Newly Diagnosed Untreated Epilepsy: A Double‐Blind Comparison with Phenytoin
- 1 May 1999
- Vol. 40 (5) , 601-607
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1528-1157.1999.tb05562.x
Abstract
Summary: Purpose: Lamotrigine is an effective add‐on therapy against a range of epileptic seizure types. Comparative studies with carbamazepine (CBZ) as monotherapy in newly diagnosed epilepsy suggest similar efficacy. In this study, lamotrigine (LTG) and phenytoin (PHT) are compared. Methods: In a double‐blind parallel‐groups study, 181 patients with newly diagnosed untreated partial seizures or secondarily or primary generalised tonic‐clonic seizures were randomised to two treatment groups. One group (n = 86) received LTG titrated over 6 weeks from a starting dose of 100 mg/day. The other (n = 95) received PHT titrated from 200 mg/day. Treatment continued for Results: The percentages of patients remaining on each treatment and seizure free during the last 24 and 40 weeks of the study, and times to first seizure after the first 6 weeks of treatment (dose‐titration period), did not differ significantly between the treatment groups. These were measures of efficacy. Time to discontinuation, a composite index of efficacy and safety, likewise did not distinguish between treatments. Adverse events led to discontinuation of 13 (15%) patients from LTG and 18 (19%) from PHT. The adverse‐event profile for LTG was dominated by skin rash [discontinuation of 10 (11.6%) patients compared with five (5.3%) from PHT] rather than central nervous system side effects: asthenia, somnolence, and ataxia were each significantly more frequent in the PHT group. The high rate of rash with LTG was probably due to the high starting dose and may be avoidable. A quality‐of‐life instrument, the SEALS inventory, favoured LTG. Patients taking PHT showed the biochemical changes expected of an enzyme‐inducing drug, whereas those taking LTG did not. Conclusions: LTG and PHT monotherapy were similarly effective against these seizure types in patients with newly diagnosed epilepsy. LTG was better tolerated, more frequently causing rash, but with a lower incidence of central nervous system side effects.Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Double-blind comparison of lamotrigine and carbamazepine in newly diagnosed epilepsyThe Lancet, 1995
- Lamotrigine Therapy for Partial Seizures: A Multicenter, Placebo‐Controlled, Double‐Blind, Cross‐Over TrialEpilepsia, 1994
- Double-blind, placebo controlled, crossover study of lamotrigine in treatment resistant partial seizures.Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 1993
- Outcomes of Add‐on Treatment with Lamotrigine in Partial EpilepsyEpilepsia, 1993
- A randomised double-blind placebo-controlled crossover add-on trial of lamotrigine in patients with treatment-resistant partial seizuresEpilepsy Research, 1990
- A randomized double-blind placebo-controlled add-on trial of lamotrigine in patients with severe epilepsyEpilepsy Research, 1990
- Double-blind crossover trial of lamotrigine (Lamictal) as add-on therapy in intractable epilepsyEpilepsy Research, 1989
- Controlled Trial of Lamotrigine (Lamictar) for Refractory Partial SeizuresEpilepsia, 1989
- Pharmacological Studies on Lamotrigine, A Novel Potential Antiepileptic DrugEpilepsia, 1986
- Pharmacological Studies on Lamotrigine, A Novel Potential Antiepileptic DrugEpilepsia, 1986