Exploring Divergence Between Respondent and Researcher Definitions of the Good in Contingent Valuation Studies
- 1 January 1999
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Agricultural Economics
- Vol. 50 (1) , 1-16
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-9552.1999.tb00791.x
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Contingent Valuation Versus Choice Experiments: Estimating the Benefits of Environmentally Sensitive Areas in ScotlandJournal of Agricultural Economics, 1998
- Must Contingent Valuation Surveys Cost So Much?Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 1996
- CONSUMER WILLINGNESS TO PAY FOR REDUCTIONS IN THE RISK OF FOOD POISONING IN THE UKJournal of Agricultural Economics, 1996
- Some Empirical Evidence on Embedding Effects in Contingent Valuation of Forest ProtectionJournal of Environmental Economics and Management, 1993
- Optimal Bid Selection for Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation SurveysJournal of Environmental Economics and Management, 1993
- Information Effects in Contingent MarketsAmerican Journal of Agricultural Economics, 1989
- Information Disclosure and Endangered Species ValuationLand Economics, 1986
- Group decision making and social influence: A social interaction sequence model.Psychological Review, 1981
- Group decision and social interaction: A theory of social decision schemes.Psychological Review, 1973
- A New Approach to Consumer TheoryJournal of Political Economy, 1966