The quality of reporting and outcome measures in randomized clinical trials related to upper-extremity disorders

This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:

• Secular changes in the quality of published randomized clinical trials in rheumatology
  Arthritis & Rheumatism, 2002
• Systematic reviews in health care: Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials
  BMJ, 2001
• The disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) outcome questionnaire: Reliability and validity of the Swedish version evaluated in 176 patients
  Acta Orthopaedica, 2000
• Assessing the Quality of Randomized Trials
  Controlled Clinical Trials, 1999
• Statistics notes: Treatment allocation in controlled trials: why randomise?
  BMJ, 1999
• Clinical trials in general surgical journals: Are methods better reported?
  Surgery, 1999
• Quality of Full and Final Publications Reporting Acute Stroke Trials
  Stroke, 1998
• The early steps in clinical research: Importance of entry criteria and true randomization
  The Journal of Hand Surgery, 1998
• Type II (β) errors in the hand literature: The importance of power
  The Journal of Hand Surgery, 1998
• Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary?
  Controlled Clinical Trials, 1996