Systematic reviews in health care: Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials

This publication has 34 references indexed in Scilit:

• Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses?
  Published by Elsevier ,1998
• Putting trials on trial--the costs and consequences of small trials in depression: a systematic review of methodology.
  Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 1997
• Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials
  JAMA, 1995
• Science of urinary incontinence
  The Lancet, 1994
• Amniotomy Or Oxytocin For Induction Of Labor: Re‐Analysis Of A Randomized Controlled Trial
  Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 1988
• The randomized clinical trial: bias in analysis.
  Circulation, 1981
• A method for assessing the quality of a randomized control trial
  Controlled Clinical Trials, 1981
• Influence of Adherence to Treatment and Response of Cholesterol on Mortality in the Coronary Drug Project
  New England Journal of Medicine, 1980
• Controversy in Counting and Attributing Events in Clinical Trials
  New England Journal of Medicine, 1979
• Factors relevant to the validity of experiments in social settings.
  Psychological Bulletin, 1957