THE CONSUMER INFORMATION OVERLOAD CONTROVERSY AND PUBLIC POLICY
- 1 February 1983
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Review of Policy Research
- Vol. 2 (3) , 465-473
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-1338.1983.tb00732.x
Abstract
It is widely believed that providing consumers with more product information produces “overload” and leads to confusion and poorer quality consumer decisions. The existence of a consumer information overload phenomenon has been used by marketers and others to argue against regulations and legislation mandating additional consumer information provision. The belief that a consumer information overload phenomenon exists is based largely on misinterpretations of research findings. The present paper reviews the consumer information overload research literature and concludes that existing research data support the contention that provision of more information, rather than producing overload, actually improves consumer decision making. Implications of the information overload research controversy for consumer policy makers are discussed.Keywords
This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- Types and Amounts of Information Used by Efficient ConsumersJournal of Consumer Affairs, 1980
- An Emerging Model for Purchase and Consumption of Non‐Prescription DrugsJournal of Consumer Affairs, 1979
- Intervening in Markets on the Basis of Imperfect Information: A Legal and Economic AnalysisUniversity of Pennsylvania Law Review, 1979
- A Model and Methodology for the Development of Consumer Information ProgramsJournal of Marketing, 1979
- Informational Inputs as Influences on Efficient Consumer Decision‐MakingJournal of Consumer Affairs, 1978
- Consumer Use of Informational Aids in SupermarketsJournal of Consumer Affairs, 1977
- Constructive Criticism and Programmatic Research: Reply to RussoJournal of Consumer Research, 1975
- Brand Choice Behavior as a Function of Information LoadJournal of Marketing Research, 1974
- The Role of Marketing Research in Public Policy Decision MakingJournal of Marketing, 1974
- Overconfidence in case-study judgments.Journal of Consulting Psychology, 1965