Cognitive Consequences of Congenital Deafness
- 1 March 1990
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in The Journal of Genetic Psychology
- Vol. 151 (1) , 103-115
- https://doi.org/10.1080/00221325.1990.9914647
Abstract
Comparing congenitally deaf children with hearing children on a variety of information processing tasks provides a natural test of the developmental consequences accompanying the long term loss of a particular sensory input. In this experiment, two sequential and two spatial tasks were used to evaluate the way deaf and hearing individuals process these different types of information. When deaf students were asked to recall the order of a string of lights, they performed as well as hearing students. Deaf students were at a significant disadvantage, however, when processing sequentially presented digits. Deaf students performed as well as hearing students on two complex, standardized spatial tasks. The loss of a major sensory modality had minimal effect on three of the four tasks investigated in the present study. Explanations for the single task with a performance differential are considered.This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- Temporal processing in deaf signers*1Brain and Language, 1987
- Digit memory in Chinese and English: Evidence for a temporally limited storeCognition, 1986
- Deaf signers and serial recall in the visual modality: Memory for signs, fingerspelling, and printMemory & Cognition, 1985
- Cognitive processing by prelingual deaf students as a function of language context.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1984
- The One-Month Temporal Stability of Children's Self-Reported Hand PreferencesJournal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 1983
- Silent reading: Insights from second-generation deaf readersCognitive Psychology, 1983
- PERIPHERAL AND CENTRAL HANDICAP AND ENCODINGJournal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 1983
- Sign-based short-term coding of American Sign Language signs and printed English words by congenitally deaf signersCognitive Psychology, 1982
- Nonauditory suffix effects in congenitally deaf signers of American Sign Language.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 1981
- Sign Language StructureAnnual Review of Anthropology, 1980