Otoacoustic Estimation of Cochlear Tuning: Validation in the Chinchilla
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 4 May 2010
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology
- Vol. 11 (3) , 343-365
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s10162-010-0217-4
Abstract
We analyze published auditory-nerve and otoacoustic measurements in chinchilla to test a network of hypothesized relationships between cochlear tuning, cochlear traveling-wave delay, and stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions (SFOAEs). We find that the physiological data generally corroborate the network of relationships, including predictions from filter theory and the coherent-reflection model of OAE generation, at locations throughout the cochlea. The results support the use of otoacoustic emissions as noninvasive probes of cochlear tuning. Developing this application, we find that tuning ratios—defined as the ratio of tuning sharpness to SFOAE phase-gradient delay in periods—have a nearly species-invariant form in cat, guinea pig, and chinchilla. Analysis of the tuning ratios identifies a species-dependent parameter that locates a transition between “apical-like” and “basal-like” behavior involving multiple aspects of cochlear physiology. Approximate invariance of the tuning ratio allows determination of cochlear tuning from SFOAE delays. We quantify the procedure and show that otoacoustic estimates of chinchilla cochlear tuning match direct measures obtained from the auditory nerve. By assuming that invariance of the tuning ratio extends to humans, we derive new otoacoustic estimates of human cochlear tuning that remain mutually consistent with independent behavioral measurements obtained using different rationales, methodologies, and analysis procedures. The results confirm that at any given characteristic frequency (CF) human cochlear tuning appears sharper than that in the other animals studied, but varies similarly with CF. We show, however, that the exceptionality of human tuning can be exaggerated by the ways in which species are conventionally compared, which take no account of evident differences between the base and apex of the cochlea. Finally, our estimates of human tuning suggest that the spatial spread of excitation of a pure tone along the human basilar membrane is comparable to that in other common laboratory animals.Keywords
This publication has 72 references indexed in Scilit:
- Coherent reflection without traveling waves: On the origin of long-latency otoacoustic emissions in lizardsThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2010
- High-frequency click-evoked otoacoustic emissions and behavioral thresholds in humansThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2009
- Medial olivocochlear efferent inhibition of basilar-membrane responses to clicks: Evidence for two modes of cochlear mechanical excitationThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2008
- Testing coherent reflection in chinchilla: Auditory-nerve responses predict stimulus-frequency emissionsThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2008
- Otoacoustic emissions in humans, birds, lizards, and frogs: evidence for multiple generation mechanismsJournal of Comparative Physiology A, 2008
- Stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emission: Measurements in humans and simulations with an active cochlear modelThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2008
- Longitudinally propagating traveling waves of the mammalian tectorial membraneProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2007
- Transmission matrix analysis of the chinchilla middle earThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2007
- Similarity of Traveling-Wave Delays in the Hearing Organs of Humans and Other TetrapodsJournal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology, 2007
- Sharpened cochlear tuning in a mouse with a genetically modified tectorial membraneNature Neuroscience, 2007