Costly Communication, Shareholder Activism, and Limits to Arbitrage
Preprint
- 1 November 2005
- preprint
- Published by Elsevier in SSRN Electronic Journal
Abstract
Using a unique hand-collected dataset, we show that shareholder activism designed to open U.S. based closed-end funds has become more frequent since the SEC's reform of the proxy rules in 1992 (the 1992 Reform) that lifted restrictions on shareholder communication. We denote this activity activist arbitrage and distinguish it from the standard pure trading arbitrage. We document a dual relationship between activist arbitrage and funds' discounts: a high discount increases the probability of activist arbitrage, while a high probability of ex post activist arbitrage reduces the ex ante discount. We provide evidence that the ease of shareholder communication is a major determinant for the emergence of activist arbitrage. This holds for the time series - activist arbitrage has become much more common following the 1992 Reform - as well as for the cross section - activist arbitrage is more likely in funds that exhibit low costs of communication. Overall, our results provide direct evidence of the presence of arbitrage activities, but also demonstrate how costly communication leads to limits on arbitrage.Keywords
This publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit:
- Earnings expectations, investor trade size, and anomalous returns around earnings announcementsJournal of Financial Economics, 2005
- Liquidity and Expected Returns: Lessons From Emerging MarketsPublished by National Bureau of Economic Research ,2005
- A Rational Model of the Closed-End Fund DiscountPublished by National Bureau of Economic Research ,2004
- Bubbles and CrashesEconometrica, 2003
- A Survey of Behavioral FinancePublished by National Bureau of Economic Research ,2002
- Takeover bids vs. Proxy Fights in Contests for Corporate ControlPublished by National Bureau of Economic Research ,2001
- Blocks, Liquidity, and Corporate ControlThe Journal of Finance, 1998
- Private benefits from block ownership and discounts on closed-end fundsJournal of Financial Economics, 1993
- Noise Trader Risk in Financial MarketsJournal of Political Economy, 1990
- ‘Open-ending’ closed-end fundsJournal of Financial Economics, 1984