Immunohistochemical Prognostic Markers in Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: Validation of Tissue Microarray As a Prerequisite for Broad Clinical Applications—A Study From the Lunenburg Lymphoma Biomarker Consortium
Top Cited Papers
- 1 March 2007
- journal article
- hematologic malignancies
- Published by American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) in Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Vol. 25 (7) , 805-812
- https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2006.09.4490
Abstract
Purpose: The results of immunohistochemical class prediction and prognostic stratification of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) have been remarkably various thus far. Apart from biologic variations, this may be caused by differences in laboratory techniques, scoring definitions, and inter- and intraobserver variations. In this study, an international collaboration of clinical lymphoma research groups from Europe, United States, and Canada concentrated on validation and standardization of immunohistochemistry of the currently potentially interesting prognostic markers in DLBCL.Patients and Methods: Sections of a tissue microarray from 36 patients with DLBCL were stained in eight laboratories with antibodies to CD20, CD5, bcl-2, bcl-6, CD10, HLA-DR, MUM1, and MIB-1 according to local methods. The study was performed in two rounds firstly focused on the evaluation of laboratory staining variation and secondly on the scoring variation.Results: Different laboratory staining techniques resulted in unexpectedly highly variable results and very poor reproducibility in scoring for almost all markers. No single laboratory stood out as uniformly poor or excellent. With elimination of variation due to staining, high agreement was found for CD20, HLA-DR, and CD10. Poor agreement was found for bcl-6 and Ki-67. Optimization of techniques and uniformly agreed on scoring criteria improved reproducibility.Conclusion: This study shows that semiquantitative immunohistochemistry for subclassification of DLBCL is feasible and reproducible, but exhibits varying rates of concordance for different markers. These findings may explain the wide variation of biomarker prognostic impact reported in the literature. Harmonization of techniques and centralized consensus review appears mandatory when using immunohistochemical biomarkers for treatment stratification.Keywords
This publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit:
- HER2 Testing by Local, Central, and Reference Laboratories in Specimens From the North Central Cancer Treatment Group N9831 Intergroup Adjuvant TrialJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2006
- BCL2 Expression Is a Prognostic Marker for the Activated B-Cell–Like Type of Diffuse Large B-Cell LymphomaJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2006
- Cell of origin, germinal center versus nongerminal center, determined by immunohistochemistry on tissue microarray, does not correlate with outcome in patients with relapsed and refractory DLBCLBlood, 2005
- NF B activity, function, and target-gene signatures in primary mediastinal large B-cell lymphoma and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma subtypesBlood, 2005
- Evaluation of immunophenotype in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and its impact on prognosisLaboratory Investigation, 2005
- Confirmation of the molecular classification of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma by immunohistochemistry using a tissue microarrayBlood, 2004
- Beyond the International Prognostic Index: New prognostic factors in follicular lymphoma and diffuse large-cell lymphomaA meeting report of the Second International Lunenburg Lymphoma WorkshopThe Hematology Journal, 2004
- Rituximab plus CHOP (R-CHOP) overcomes bcl-2--associated resistance to chemotherapy in elderly patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL)Blood, 2003
- Clinical impact of the differentiation profile assessed by immunophenotyping in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphomaBlood, 2003
- Distinct types of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma identified by gene expression profilingNature, 2000