HER2 Testing by Local, Central, and Reference Laboratories in Specimens From the North Central Cancer Treatment Group N9831 Intergroup Adjuvant Trial
Top Cited Papers
- 1 July 2006
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) in Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Vol. 24 (19) , 3032-3038
- https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2005.03.4744
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate concordance between local and central laboratory HER2 testing results in patients from the North Central Cancer Treatment Group (NCCTG) N9831 adjuvant trial of trastuzumab. Patients and Methods: NCCTG N9831 is a randomized, phase III clinical trial comparing three drug regimens: doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide followed by paclitaxel with trastuzumab added concurrently, sequentially, or not at all as adjuvant therapy for women with HER2-positive resected breast cancer. Originally, patients were eligible if their tumors were HER2 positive by either local laboratory immunohistochemistry (IHC) or fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). A protocol modification in 2002 made central laboratory testing mandatory, with additional testing of discordant cases conducted by a reference laboratory. Concordance between local and central laboratory, and level of agreement between central and reference laboratory HER2 findings in discordant cases were examined. Results: HER2 positivity was confirmed in 85.8% of 2,535 patients registered since March 2002. When local and central evaluation used the same methodology, concordance was 88.1% for FISH and 81.6% for a diagnostic test for presence of the HER2 protein. Among discordant cases examined at the reference laboratory, there was 94.3% agreement for IHC (0, 1+, 2+) and 95.2% agreement for FISH (not gene amplified). Conclusion: There was a high degree of discordance between local and central testing for IHC and FISH, but a high degree of agreement between central and reference laboratories. These findings support the importance of using high-volume, experienced laboratories for HER2 testing to improve the process of selecting patients likely to benefit from trastuzumab therapy.Keywords
This publication has 32 references indexed in Scilit:
- HER2and Responsiveness of Breast Cancer to Adjuvant ChemotherapyNew England Journal of Medicine, 2006
- Trastuzumab plus Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Operable HER2-Positive Breast CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 2005
- Determination of HER2 Gene Amplification by Fluorescence In situ Hybridization and Concordance with the Clinical Trials Immunohistochemical Assay in Women with Metastatic Breast Cancer Evaluated for Treatment with TrastuzumabBreast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2005
- Effect of Doxorubicin Plus Cyclophosphamide on Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction in Patients With Breast Cancer in the North Central Cancer Treatment Group N9831 Intergroup Adjuvant TrialJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2004
- HER2 Testing in Patients With Breast Cancer: Poor Correlation Between Weak Positivity by Immunohistochemistry and Gene Amplification by Fluorescence In Situ HybridizationMayo Clinic Proceedings, 2002
- Efficacy and Safety of Trastuzumab as a Single Agent in First-Line Treatment of HER2-Overexpressing Metastatic Breast CancerJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2002
- Use of Chemotherapy plus a Monoclonal Antibody against HER2 for Metastatic Breast Cancer That Overexpresses HER2New England Journal of Medicine, 2001
- HER2 and Choice of Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Invasive Breast Cancer: National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Protocol B-15JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2000
- P46 15 year update of the naples GUN trial of adjuvant breast cancer therapy: Evidence of interaction between c-erb-B2 expression and Tamoxifen efficacyEuropean Journal Of Cancer, 1998
- Human Breast Cancer: Correlation of Relapse and Survival with Amplification of the HER-2/ neu OncogeneScience, 1987