The Intrinsic-Extrinsic Dichotomy: Toward Conceptual Clarity
- 1 July 1977
- journal article
- Published by Academy of Management in Academy of Management Review
- Vol. 2 (3) , 496-500
- https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1977.4281861
Abstract
In this article the authors examine and define the concepts of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation as well as intrinsic and extrinsic outcome. They examine these concepts in the context of employee motivation, noting that intrinsically motivated employees attend to their work due to feelings of self-fulfillment where as extrinsically motivated employees go about their jobs while being driven by factors or events whose delivery is dependent on a source outside of the immediate task. The authors note that the debate will surely continue over this subject and its application in social psychology and urge researchers to continue examining organizational behavior.Keywords
This publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit:
- Classifying outcomes in work motivation research: An examination of the intrinsic-extrinsic dichotomy.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1975
- Employee reactions to job characteristics: A constructive replication.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1975
- Interaction of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: Some methodological notes.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1975
- Self-perception of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1975
- Cognitive evaluation theory and some comments on the Calder and Staw critique.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1975
- The effects of contingent and noncontingent rewards and controls on intrinsic motivationOrganizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1972
- Intrinsic motivation, extrinsic reinforcement, and inequity.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1972
- Employee reactions to job characteristics.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1971
- Effects of externally mediated rewards on intrinsic motivation.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1971
- Self-perception: An alternative interpretation of cognitive dissonance phenomena.Psychological Review, 1967