The cumulative risk of a false‐positive recall in the Norwegian Breast Cancer Screening Program
Open Access
- 17 September 2004
- Vol. 101 (7) , 1501-1507
- https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.20528
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Biennial breast cancer screening for women ages 50–69 years is recommended by the World Health Organization. It has been claimed that the cumulative risk of a false‐positive recall is a significant disadvantage in breast cancer screening programs. The primary objective of this study was to estimate the cumulative risk of a false‐positive recall during a screening period of 20 years in women ages 50–51 years who are screened biennially in a population‐based screening program. A secondary objective was to estimate the cumulative risk of undergoing fine‐needle aspiration cytology, core needle biopsy, and open biopsy with benign morphology in the same group of women.METHODS: The Norwegian Breast Cancer Screening Program invites all women ages 50–69 years who reside in the country to a 2‐view mammography biennially. A nationwide data base that covers all of the invited women includes individual information about all screening activity. Results from three screening rounds in four counties were the basis for this study. False‐positive recalls due to abnormal mammograms among 83,416 women who participated all the 3 screening rounds were the basis for the estimations.RESULTS: It was calculated that women ages 50–51 years who participate in biennial screening run a cumulative risk of 20.8% for a false‐positive recall during a screening period of 2 decades. The cumulative risk of undergoing fine‐needle aspiration cytology was estimated at 3.9%, and the risk of undergoing core needle biopsy or open biopsy with benign morphology was 1.5% and 0.9%, respectively.CONCLUSIONS: False‐positive recalls are a disadvantage in a breast cancer screening programs, but the cumulative risk seemed to be acceptable in the Norwegian Breast Cancer Screening Program. It is important to communicate the existence and extent of this risk to the target group. Cancer 2004. © 2004 American Cancer Society.Keywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comparison of Screening Mammography in the United States and the United KingdomJAMA, 2003
- Women who are recalled for further investigation for breast screening: psychological consequences 3 years after recall and factors affecting re-attendanceJournal of Public Health, 2001
- Association of Recall Rates with Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Values of Screening MammographyAmerican Journal of Roentgenology, 2001
- Screening for breast cancer is associated with a low degree of psychological distressThe Breast, 2001
- Effect on sensitivity and specificity of mammography screening with or without comparison of old mammogramsActa Radiologica, 2000
- Case 35-1998New England Journal of Medicine, 1998
- False Positive Rate of Screening MammographyNew England Journal of Medicine, 1998
- Ten-Year Risk of False Positive Screening Mammograms and Clinical Breast ExaminationsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1998
- The positive predictive value of mammography.American Journal of Roentgenology, 1992
- Screening for Breast CancerAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1989