Is Propofol Cost-Effective for Day-Surgery Patients?
Open Access
- 1 May 1991
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Anaesthesia and Intensive Care
- Vol. 19 (2) , 201-204
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0310057x9101900208
Abstract
To attempt to justify the expense of using propofol for day-surgery, we have compared propofol with methohexitone for induction of anaesthesia for elective minor gynaecological procedures. Seventy healthy patients were randomised to receive either induction agent and postoperatively they were compared for recovery times, side-effects and patient appraisal the following day. The results showed that propofol was superior to methohexitone for most parameters, with small but statistically significant differences in response time, ambulation time, vomiting and drowsiness during recovery. There were minor differences in patient appraisal the next day. However, it is doubtful whether the advantages of propofol are sufficiently substantial to justify the expense of its routine use in preference to methohexitone and its place is a matter for individual judgement.Keywords
This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- Multicentre study of propofol in day case surgeryAnaesthesia, 1988
- Mood evaluation and outpatient anaesthesiaAnaesthesia, 1988
- COMPARISION OF THE NEW EMULSION FORMULATION OF PROPOFOL WITH METHOHEXITONE AND THIOPENTONE FOR INDUCTION OF ANAESTHESIA IN DAY CASESBritish Journal of Anaesthesia, 1985
- A Model for Studying Depth of Anesthesia and Acute Tolerance to ThiopentalAnesthesiology, 1983
- PHARMACOKINETIC EVALUATION OF ICI 35 868 IN MANBritish Journal of Anaesthesia, 1983