A Comparative Evaluation of Moxalactam: Antimicrobial Activity, Pharmacokinetics, Adverse Reactions, and Clinical Efficacy
- 8 July 1982
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Pharmacotherapy: The Journal of Human Pharmacology and Drug Therapy
- Vol. 2 (4) , 197-210
- https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1875-9114.1982.tb03187.x
Abstract
Although moxalactam is not, technically speaking, a cephalosporin it is chemically and microbiologically so closely related to those compounds that it can be viewed as a member of the cephalosporin family. Moxalactam has a spectrum of activity that includes both gram positive and gram negative bacteria. Its gram positive activity is less than earlier cephalosporins, but its activity against the Enterobacteriaceae is similar to that of the aminoglycoside family of antibiotics in most comparative studies. Although moxalactam is considerably less active against gram positive bacteria than cefotaxime, another third generation cephalosporin, its higher and more prolonged serum levels probably offset this disadvantage. Compared to cefoperazone, the stability of moxalactam to many types of beta lactamases produced by gram negative bacteria may be advantageous in the therapy of infections caused by hospital-acquired pathogens. Clinical studies suggest that moxalactam can be used for empiric therapy of suspected gram negative infections when Pseudomonas and other non-fermentative bacteria, such as Acinetobacter, are not suspected. Impressive improvements in the survival of patients with gram negative enteric bacillary meningitis have been reported. Although moxalactam, cefotaxime, and cefoperazone have activity against Pseudomonas aeruginosa, none of these antibiotics should be used alone as therapy for suspected or proven severe systemic infections caused by this pathogen. Cost is a major problem with all of the new cephalosporin-like antibiotics. While this high cost may be partially balanced by the use of a single agent compared to an antibiotic combination for therapy in some situations, these antibiotics are not cost effective for prophylactic use. Superinfection with fungi, such as Candida, and Streptococcus faecalis have occurred, and toxicities, such as bleeding due to vitamin K deficiency and disulfuram-like reactions, have also been reported. Reports of resistance to moxalactam and the other third generation cephalosporins are of major concern and indicate the need to closely monitor antibiotic susceptibility patterns of hospital acquired organisms if these antibiotics are to be used for empiric therapy of suspected gram negative non-pseudomonas sepsis.Keywords
This publication has 78 references indexed in Scilit:
- Treatment of severe neonatal infections with cefotaxime. Efficacy and pharmacokineticsThe Journal of Pediatrics, 1982
- Diffusion of moxalactam into the cerebrospinal fluid in children with bacterial meningitisThe Journal of Pediatrics, 1981
- Studies of moxalactam for gram-negativeand Haemophilus influenzae meningitis: An appraisalThe Journal of Pediatrics, 1981
- Therapeutic Efficacy of 29 Antimicrobial Regimens in Experimental Intraabdominal SepsisClinical Infectious Diseases, 1981
- Clinical Efficacy of Moxalactam with Emphasis on Infections Due to Multidrug-Resistant Organisms in Patients with Renal InsufficiencyChemotherapy, 1981
- Activity and Specific Beta-Lactamase Susceptibility of Cefoperazone and MoxalactamChemotherapy, 1981
- Pharmacokinetics and cerebrospinal fluid penetration of moxalactam in children with bacterial meningitisThe Journal of Pediatrics, 1981
- Clinical evaluation of a new broad-spectrum oxa-beta-lactam antibiotic, moxalactam, in neonates and infantsThe Journal of Pediatrics, 1981
- The in vitro antibacterial activity of LY127935 (6059S), a novel 1-oxa-β-lactam antibioticJournal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 1980
- INTERACTION BETWEEN MOXALACTAM AND ALCOHOLThe Lancet, 1980