The ethics of using placebo in hypertension clinical trials
- 1 January 1999
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Journal Of Hypertension
- Vol. 17 (1) , 5-8
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00004872-199917010-00002
Abstract
Placebo controls can enhance the value of two types of hypertension trials: measurement of the blood pressure-lowering efficacy of antihypertensive treatment and determination of whether therapeutic interventions can affect clinical endpoints. However, the possibility of adverse outcomes in hpertensive patients allocated to placebo therapy raises ethical concerns. Placebo controls in efficacy studies are particularly helpful in thoroughly quantifying the effect of treatment. The hazard to patients can be minimized by exposing them to placebo for the least possible amount of time and, assuming that blood pressure is itself the primary variable, reducing the probability of cardiovascular events by excluding subjects with severe hypertension or major concomitant risk factors. Endpoint studies present a more difficult challenge, for they are designed in anticipation of cardiovascular events and patients at high risk are often enrolled in order to more rapidly achieve the required number of endpoints for statistical analysis. In such circumstances, positive therapeutic controls, despite the complexities of analysis, must be preferred to placebo. Important questions regarding the management of early-stage hypertension remain, and despite official treatment guidelines recommendations, currently based chiefly on extrapolation and judgement, many physicians routinely withhold therapy in mild hypertension, even when other risk factors are present. With appropriate safeguards, placebo-controlled trials may be necessary to examine potenial benefits of therapy in such patients. Indeed, resolving therapeutic uncertainty and creating well founded recommendations for the future management of the many patients with milder forms of hypertension can make placebo controls both ethical and appropriate.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- JNC-VI: a view from the United KingdomJournal of Human Hypertension, 1998
- Effects of intensive blood-pressure lowering and low-dose aspirin in patients with hypertension: principal results of the Hypertension Optimal Treatment (HOT) randomised trialThe Lancet, 1998
- Outcome Results of the Fosinopril Versus Amlodipine Cardiovascular Events Randomized Trial (FACET) in Patients With Hypertension and NIDDMDiabetes Care, 1998
- The Effect of Nisoldipine as Compared with Enalapril on Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients with Non-Insulin-Dependent Diabetes and HypertensionNew England Journal of Medicine, 1998
- Randomised double-blind comparison of placebo and active treatment for older patients with isolated systolic hypertensionThe Lancet, 1997
- Achievement and Safety of a Low Blood Pressure Goal in Chronic Renal DiseaseHypertension, 1997
- Trends in the Prevalence, Awareness, Treatment, and Control of Hypertension in the Adult US PopulationHypertension, 1995
- Treatment of Mild Hypertension Study. Final results. Treatment of Mild Hypertension Study Research GroupPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1993
- Effects of treatment on morbidity in hypertension. II. Results in patients with diastolic blood pressure averaging 90 through 114 mm HgPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1970
- Effects of treatment on morbidity in hypertension. Results in patients with diastolic blood pressures averaging 115 through 129 mm HgJAMA, 1967