Central corneal thickness measured by the Orbscan II system, contact ultrasound pachymetry, and the Artemis 2 system
- 1 November 2008
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery
- Vol. 34 (11) , 1906-1912
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2008.07.013
Abstract
PURPOSE: To compare central corneal thickness (CCT) measurements by the Orbscan II device, contact ultrasound (US) pachymetry, and the noncontact Artemis 2 scanning US system. SETTING: Department of Ophthalmology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA. METHODS: The CCT in 40 eyes (20 normal subjects) was measured by the Orbscan II followed by contact US pachymetry and then the Artemis 2. Results were compared using analysis of variance (ANOVA), paired t tests, and Bland-Altman plots. RESULTS: There was a significant difference in CCT measurements between the 3 modes (F = 32.84, P = .0001, 1-way ANOVA). Artemis 2 and US pachymetry measurements were highly correlated (r2 = 0.963, P<.0001), although Artemis 2 values were a mean of 11.2 μm ± 6.6 (SD) thinner than pachymetry values. Artemis 2 and Orbscan II measurements were less well correlated (r2 = 0.851, P<.001); Orbscan II values were a mean of 7.5 ± 15.7 μm thinner than Artemis 2 values. Orbscan II values showed a trend toward increasing underestimation of CCT in thinner corneas. CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasound pachymetry and Artemis 2 CCT measurements were highly correlated; the 11 μm mean difference in measurements may be attributed to decentration, oblique incidence of the probe to the cornea, or possibly the effect of topical anesthesia with contact pachymetry. Although the mean difference between Orbscan II and Artemis 2 values was 7.5 μm, Orbscan values were less correlated than Artemis 2 values with contact US pachymetry and were prone to underestimation of the CCT in thinner corneas.Keywords
This publication has 31 references indexed in Scilit:
- Effect of central corneal thickness on Goldmann applanation tonometry measures—a different result with different pachymetersAlbrecht von Graefes Archiv für Ophthalmologie, 2007
- Corneal Thickness Values Before and After Oxybuprocaine 0.4% Eye DropsCornea, 2003
- Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements by specular microscopy, ultrasound pachymetry, and ultrasound biomicroscopyJournal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, 2003
- Reliability of pachymetric measurements using orbscan after excimer refractive surgeryOphthalmology, 2003
- Central and peripheral corneal thickness measurement with Orbscan II and topographical ultrasound pachymetryJournal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, 2003
- A comparison of two pachymetric systems: slit-scanning and ultrasonic.Published by Rockefeller University Press ,2002
- Comparison of corneal pachymetry using ultrasound and Orbscan IIJournal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, 2002
- Accuracy of Orbscan pachymetry measurements and DHG ultrasound pachymetry in primary laser in situ keratomileusis and LASIK enhancement proceduresJournal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, 2001
- Central Corneal Thickness Measurement with a Retinal Optical Coherence Tomography Device Versus Standard Ultrasonic PachymetryCornea, 2001
- Arc-scanning Very High-frequency Digital Ultrasound for 3D Pachymetric Mapping of the Corneal Epithelium and Stroma in Laser in situ KeratomileusisJournal of Refractive Surgery, 2000