Bias in Achievement Testing: Follow-Up Report of the AMECD Commission on Bias in Measurement
- 13 July 1986
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development
- Vol. 19 (2) , 102-112
- https://doi.org/10.1080/07481756.1986.12022829
Abstract
In this article the authors describe what publishers of major achievement tests are now doing to minimize bias and offer recommendations for changes still needed.Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- A theoretical framework for the exploration of causes and effects of bias in testingEducational Psychologist, 1984
- EMPIRICAL COMPARISON OF SELECTED ITEM BIAS DETECTION PROCEDURES WITH BIAS MANIPULATIONJournal of Educational Measurement, 1984
- Scrutinizing psychological tests: Measurement equivalence and equivalent relations with external variables are the central issues.Psychological Bulletin, 1984
- Comparison of Procedures for Detecting test-Item Bias with both Internal and External Ability CriteriaJournal of Educational Statistics, 1981
- INTERACTIONS BETWEEN ITEM CONTENT AND GROUP MEMBERSHIP ON ACHIEVEMENT TEST ITEMSJournal of Educational Measurement, 1981
- A Comparison of a Statistical and Subjective Procedure to Ascertain Item Validity: One Step in the Test Validation ProcessEducational and Psychological Measurement, 1980
- A MONTE CARLO COMPARISON OF SEVEN BIASED ITEM DETECTION TECHNIQUESJournal of Educational Measurement, 1980
- A METHOD OF ASSESSING BIAS IN TEST ITEMSJournal of Educational Measurement, 1979
- AMEG Commission Report on Sex Bias in Interest MeasurementMeasurement and Evaluation in Guidance, 1973
- ITEM‐RACE INTERACTION ON A TEST OF SCHOLASTIC APTITUDE1Journal of Educational Measurement, 1973