Dermal Healing After Local Skin Flaps and Chemical Peel
- 1 July 1990
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Medical Association (AMA) in JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery
- Vol. 116 (7) , 794-797
- https://doi.org/10.1001/archotol.1990.01870070042007
Abstract
• Like cells respond to injury through repair mechanisms unique for each cell type (eg, regeneration of the epidermis, granulation over exposed fat). How simultaneous chemical peel affects a local skin flap and why minimal differences in chemical peels can result in significant differences in outcome is not fully understood. In this study guinea pig skin was exposed to skin flap elevation, chemical peel, or a combination of the two. Biopsy specimens were taken at 3 to 35 days after injury and the histologic sections were studied. Results demonstrate that (1) lifting a flap causes changes in the subcutaneous tissue and reticular dermis that makes it more vulnerable to secondary injury and (2) the reticular dermis responds to injury as two physiologically distinct layers, although it appears histologically homogeneous. The upper reticular dermis heals by reorganization, while the deeper reticular dermis heals by scar formation. The differing response to injury of these cell layers may in part explain the low safety margin in aggressive chemical peels. (Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1990;116:794-797)This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Long-Term Histologic Follow-Up of Phenol Face PeelsPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 1985
- A Study of Dermabrasion and Chemical Peels in an Animal ModelThe Journal of Dermatologic Surgery and Oncology, 1980
- Chemical Face PeelOtolaryngologic Clinics of North America, 1980
- Comparative Histological Study of Mini Pig Skin After Chemical Peel and DermabrasionJAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery, 1977
- CHEMOSURGERY???A HISTOLOGICAL STUDYPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 1970
- CHEMICAL FACE PEELING AND RHYTIDECTOMYPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 1962