Familial risk ratios for high and low physical fitness levels in the Canadian population
- 1 March 2000
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
- Vol. 32 (3) , 614-619
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00005768-200003000-00010
Abstract
KATZMARZYK, P. T., L. PÉRUSSE, D. C. RAO and C. BOUCHARD. Familial risk ratios for high and low physical fitness levels in the Canadian population. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc., Vol. 32, No. 3, pp. 614–619, 2000. Purpose: To estimate the familial risk of being physically fit or unfit in Canada. Methods: The sample consisted of 11,680 participants from 4144 nuclear families of the 1981 Canada Fitness Survey. Indicators of physical fitness included estimated physical working capacity at a heart rate of 150 beats·min−1 derived from a step test (PWC150), hand grip strength, sit-ups, and trunk flexibility. Probands were defined as reference individuals who were physically fit (95th, 85th, and 75th percentiles) or physically unfit (25th, 15th, and 5th percentiles) for each fitness indicator, respectively. Results: Standardized risk ratios, adjusted for age and sex (SRR), for spouses and first-degree relatives of probands exceeding the 95th percentile are 1.63 and 1.81 for PWC150, 2.38 and 3.16 for grip strength, 2.63 and 3.98 for sit-ups, and 2.59 and 3.56 for trunk flexibility, respectively, whereas the SRR for spouses and first-degree relatives of probands below the 5th percentile are 1.54 and 1.34 for PWC150, 1.83 and 1.85 for grip strength, 1.13 and 1.53 for sit-ups, and 1.42 and 1.84 for trunk flexibility, respectively. The familial risks tend to be greatest at the extremes (95th and 5th percentiles) and the risks for first-degree relatives of physically fit probands are generally greater than those for spouses for grip strength, sit-ups and trunk flexibility, whereas those for PWC150 show no clear pattern. Conclusion: There is significant familial risk for being physically fit or unfit in the Canadian population. The pattern of SRR suggests that the familial risk for indicators of strength and flexibility may be due, in part, to genetic factors, whereas the shared family environment is largely contributing to the familial risk for PWC150.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Familial risk of obesity and central adipose tissue distribution in the general Canadian population.American Journal of Epidemiology, 1999
- Familial risk ratios for extreme obesity: implications for mapping human obesity genesInternational Journal of Obesity, 1997
- Risch's lambda values for human obesity estimated from segregation analysisInternational Journal of Obesity, 1997
- Combining extremely concordant sibpairs with extremely discordant sibpairs provides a cost effective way to linkage analysis of quantitative trait lociGenetic Epidemiology, 1996
- Familial Resemblance in Maximal Heart Rate, Blood Lactate and Aerobic PowerHuman Heredity, 1985
- Family resemblance for neuromuscular performance in a Kansas Mennonite communityAmerican Journal of Physical Anthropology, 1984
- Submaximal power output in adopted and biological siblingsAnnals of Human Biology, 1984
- Adaptation to maximal effort: genetics and age.Journal of Applied Physiology, 1973