Validation of a Decision Regret Scale
Top Cited Papers
- 1 July 2003
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Medical Decision Making
- Vol. 23 (4) , 281-292
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989x03256005
Abstract
Background. As patients become more involved in health care decisions, there may be greater opportunity for decision regret. The authors could not find a validated, reliable tool for measuring regret after health care decisions. Methods. A5- item scale was administered to 4 patient groups making different health care decisions. Convergent validity was deter- mined by examining the scale's correlation with satisfaction measures, decisional conflict, and health outcome measures. Results. The scale showed good internal consistency (Cronbach's = 0.81 to 0.92). It correlated strongly with decision satisfaction (r = -0.40 to -0.60), decisional conflict (r = 0.31 to 0.52), and overall rated quality of life (r = -0.25 to - 0.27). Groups differing on feelings about a decision also differed on rated regret: F(2, 190) = 31.1, P < 0.001. Regret was greater among those who changed their decisions than those who did not, t(175) = 16.11, P < 0.001. Conclusions. The scale is a useful indicator of health care decision regret at a given point in time.Keywords
This publication has 58 references indexed in Scilit:
- Regret and Responsibility Resolved? Evaluating Ordóñez and Connolly's (2000) ConclusionsOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 2000
- Emotional Reactions to the Outcomes of Decisions: The Role of Counterfactual Thought in the Experience of Regret and DisappointmentOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1998
- Reconsidering the Relation between Regret and ResponsibilityOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1998
- Consequences of Regret Aversion 2: Additional Evidence for Effects of Feedback on Decision MakingOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1997
- Is Regret Theory an alternative basis for estimating the value of healthcare interventions?Health Policy, 1996
- Decision Making and the Search for Fundamental Psychological Regularities: What Can Be Learned from a Process Perspective?Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1996
- Anticipated affective reactions and prevention of AIDSBritish Journal of Social Psychology, 1995
- The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: A Quality-of-Life Instrument for Use in International Clinical Trials in OncologyJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 1993
- Evaluation of regret after tubal sterilizationInternational Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 1992
- The halo effect: Evidence for unconscious alteration of judgments.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1977