Incorporating Patients' Preferences into Medical Decisions
- 30 June 1994
- journal article
- Published by Massachusetts Medical Society in New England Journal of Medicine
- Vol. 330 (26) , 1895-1896
- https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199406303302611
Abstract
As our medical decisions become more and more standardized and codified, we should take care to ensure that critical therapeutic choices are not based exclusively on formal guidelines. Many decisions need to be individualized, especially when they involve choices between possible outcomes that may be viewed differently by different patients. In such cases we should identify a patient's preferences scrupulously -- a point underscored by O'Meara and colleagues in this issue of the Journal1. They present a decision analysis of the choice between heparin alone and streptokinase plus heparin in the treatment of deep venous thrombosis. The result helps . . .Keywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Decision Analysis of Streptokinase plus Heparin as Compared with Heparin Alone for Deep-Vein ThrombosisNew England Journal of Medicine, 1994
- Antithrombotic Therapy for Venous Thromboembolic DiseaseChest, 1992
- Whose Utilities for Decision Analysis?Medical Decision Making, 1990
- Effects of framing and level of probability on patients' preferences for cancer chemotherapyJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1989
- Thrombolytic Therapy: Current StatusNew England Journal of Medicine, 1988
- Preferences for Health OutcomesMedical Decision Making, 1984
- Discount Functions and the Measurement of Patients' ValuesMedical Decision Making, 1984
- On the Elicitation of Preferences for Alternative TherapiesNew England Journal of Medicine, 1982
- Thrombolytic Therapy in Thrombosis: A National Institutes of Health Consensus Development ConferenceAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1980
- Fallacy of the Five-Year Survival in Lung CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 1978