Hidden Liquidity: Some New Light on Dark Trading
Preprint
- 5 December 2011
- preprint
- Published by Elsevier in SSRN Electronic Journal
Abstract
We use a laboratory market to investigate how the ability to hide orders affects traders’ strategies and market outcomes. We examine three market structures: Visible markets in which all orders must be displayed, Iceberg markets in which a minimum size must be displayed, and Hidden markets in which orders can be displayed, partially displayed, or completely non-displayed. We find that although order strategies are greatly affected by allowing hidden liquidity, most market outcomes are not. Our results on the robustness of informational efficiency and liquidity to opacity regimes have important regulatory implications for debates surrounding dark trading.Keywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Undisclosed Orders and Optimal Submission Strategies in a Dynamic Limit Order MarketSSRN Electronic Journal, 2011
- Hidden liquidity: An analysis of order exposure strategies in electronic stock marketsJournal of Financial Economics, 2009
- How Noise Trading Affects Markets: An Experimental AnalysisThe Review of Financial Studies, 2009
- Supply and Information Content of Order Book Depth: The Case of Displayed and Hidden DepthSSRN Electronic Journal, 2007
- Lifting the Veil: An Analysis of Pre‐trade Transparency at the NYSEThe Journal of Finance, 2005
- The “make or take” decision in an electronic market: Evidence on the evolution of liquidityJournal of Financial Economics, 2005
- Can order exposure be mandated?Journal of Financial Markets, 2004
- The use of undisclosed limit orders on the Australian Stock ExchangeJournal of Banking & Finance, 2001
- Can transparent markets survive?Journal of Financial Economics, 2000
- Does order preferencing matter?Journal of Financial Economics, 1998