Net costs from three perspectives of using low versus high osmolality contrast medium in diagnostic angiocardiography
- 30 June 1993
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of the American College of Cardiology
- Vol. 21 (7) , 1701-1709
- https://doi.org/10.1016/0735-1097(93)90390-m
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- Cardiovascular effects of iodinated contrast agentsThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1990
- Randomized comparison of the cost and effectiveness of iopamidol and diatrizoate as contrast agents for cardiac angiographyJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1990
- Contrast media safety; What do we know and how do we know it?The American Journal of Cardiology, 1990
- Contrast media-related complications during cardiac catheterization using HexabrixTM or RenografinTM in high-risk patientsThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1988
- Hemodynamic and electrocardiographic consequences of high‐ and low‐osmolality contrast agents for left ventricular angiographyCatheterization and Cardiovascular Diagnosis, 1988
- Comparison of the electrocardiographic and hemodynamic responses to ionic and nonionic radiocontrast media during left ventriculography: A randomized double-blind studyAmerican Heart Journal, 1986
- Comparison of an Ionic with a Nonionic Contrast Agent for Cardiac AngiographyInvestigative Radiology, 1985
- To Buy or Not to BuyNew England Journal of Medicine, 1984
- Hemodynamic changes induced by cardiac angiography with ioxaglate: Comparison with diatrizoateJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1983
- Hemodynamic and electrocardiographic effects in man of a new nonionic contrast agent (iohexol): Advantages over standard ionic agentsThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1983