Competition And New Technology
- 1 November 2005
- journal article
- Published by Health Affairs (Project Hope) in Health Affairs
- Vol. 24 (6) , 1523-1535
- https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.24.6.1523
Abstract
Most real medical spending growth is accounted for by beneficial but costly new technology. This paper argues that a missing dimension of our concepts of competition among health plans is a focus on their policy toward new technology. In principle, plans could choose to move rapidly or slowly, inclusively or selectively, toward adopting new technologies, broadly defined. These policies would affect the rates of growth of their premiums, and consumers could choose among plans depending on both the technology policy and premium growth. Legal impediments, physician resistance, and membership turnover are all possible obstacles. Further thought should be given to making technology policy an explicit dimension of plan competition.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Barriers To Constraining Health Care Cost GrowthHealth Affairs, 2004
- Market Insurance, Public Insurance and the Rate of Technical Change in Medical CareThe Geneva Risk and Insurance Review, 2003
- Asymmetric Information in Health Insurance: Evidence from the National Medical Expenditure SurveyThe RAND Journal of Economics, 2001
- An efficient employer strategy for dealing with adverse selection in multiple-plan offerings: an MSA exampleJournal of Health Economics, 2000
- How Does Managed Care Do It?The RAND Journal of Economics, 2000
- The Effects of Health Insurance on Access to New Medical TechnologiesInternational Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 1997
- Eliminating Waste and Inefficiency Can Do Little to Contain CostsHealth Affairs, 1994