Power‐law species–area relationships and self‐similar species distributions within finite areas
- 27 November 2003
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Ecology Letters
- Vol. 7 (1) , 60-68
- https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1461-0248.2003.00549.x
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 29 references indexed in Scilit:
- Post‐fire recovery of ant communities in Submediterranean Pinus nigra forestsEcography, 2005
- Geometry of the species–area relationship in central European birds: testing the mechanismJournal of Animal Ecology, 2003
- Scale dependency and fractal dimension of rarityEcography, 2003
- Pink landscapes: 1/ f spectra of spatial environmental variability and bird community compositionProceedings Of The Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 2002
- Patterns of commonness and rarity in central European birds: reliability of the core‐satellite hypothesis within a large scaleEcography, 2002
- Fractal species distributions do not produce power‐law species‐area relationshipsOikos, 2002
- Self‐Similarity and the Relationship between Abundance and Range SizeThe American Naturalist, 2001
- Random self‐similar river networks and derivations of generalized Horton Laws in terms of statistical simple scalingWater Resources Research, 2000
- Species–Area Curves Based on Geographic Range and OccupancyJournal of Theoretical Biology, 1999
- On Species-Area RelationsThe American Naturalist, 1996