Use of the BacT/Alert Blood Culture System for Culture of Sterile Body Fluids Other than Blood
- 1 November 1998
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Society for Microbiology in Journal of Clinical Microbiology
- Vol. 36 (11) , 3273-7
- https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.36.11.3273-3277.1998
Abstract
Studies have demonstrated that large-volume culture methods for sterile body fluids other than blood increase recovery compared to traditional plated-medium methods. BacT/Alert is a fully automated blood culture system for detecting bacteremia and fungemia. In this study, we compared culture in BacT/Alert standard aerobic and anaerobic bottles, BacT/Alert FAN aerobic and FAN anaerobic bottles, and culture on routine media for six specimen types, i.e., continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysate (CAPD), peritoneal, amniotic, pericardial, synovial, and pleural fluids. Specimen volumes were divided equally among the three arms of the study. A total of 1,157 specimens were tested, with 227 significant isolates recovered from 193 specimens. Recovery by method was as follows: standard bottles, 186 of 227 (82%); FAN bottles, 217 of 227 (96%); and routine culture, 184 of 227 (81%). The FAN bottles recovered significantly more gram-positive cocci (P < 0.001), Staphylococcus aureus (P = 0.003), coagulase-negative staphylococci (P = 0.008), gram-negative bacilli (P < 0.001), Enterobacteriaceae (P = 0.005), and total organisms (P < 0.001) than the routine culture. There were no significant differences in recovery between the standard bottles and the routine culture. The FAN aerobic bottle recovered significantly more gram-positive cocci (P < 0.001), S. aureus isolates (P < 0.001), coagulase-negative staphyococci (P = 0.003), and total organisms (P < 0.001) than the standard aerobic bottle, while the FAN anaerobic bottle recovered significantly more gram-positive cocci (P < 0.001), S. aureus isolates (P < 0.001), Enterobacteriaceae (P = 0.03), and total organisms (P < 0.001) than the standard anaerobic bottle. For specific specimen types, significantly more isolates were recovered from the FAN bottles compared to the routine culture for synovial (P < 0.001) and CAPD (P = 0.004) fluids. Overall, the FAN bottles were superior in performance to both the standard bottles and the routine culture for detection of microorganisms from the types of sterile body fluids included in this study.Keywords
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- Improved detection of bacterial growth in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis effluent by use of BacT/Alert FAN bottlesJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 1997
- Clinical importance of increased sensitivity of BacT/Alert FAN aerobic and anaerobic blood culture bottlesJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 1996
- Controlled evaluation of BacT/alert standard anaerobic and FAN anaerobic blood culture bottles for the detection of bacteremia and fungemiaJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 1995
- Clinical impact of bacteria and fungi recovered only from broth culturesJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 1995
- High prevalence of Kingella kingae in joint fluid from children with septic arthritis revealed by the BACTEC blood culture systemJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 1992
- Microbiological aspects of peritonitis associated with continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysisClinical Microbiology Reviews, 1992
- Improved method for bacteriological diagnosis of spontaneous bacterial peritonitisJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 1989
- Comparison of methods for processing dialysate in suspected continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis-associated peritonitisDiagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease, 1987
- Improved method of isolating bacteria from joint fluids by the use of blood culture bottles.Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 1986
- The importance of volume of blood cultured in the detection of bacteremia and fungemiaPublished by Elsevier ,1983