Outcomes with Invasive vs Conservative Management of Cardiogenic Shock Complicating Acute Myocardial Infarction
- 1 June 2015
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in The American Journal of Medicine
- Vol. 128 (6) , 601-608
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2014.12.009
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- 2013 ACCF/AHA Guideline for the Management of ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Executive SummaryCirculation, 2013
- Early Revascularization and Long-term Survival in Cardiogenic Shock Complicating Acute Myocardial InfarctionJAMA, 2006
- Heart failure, chronic diuretic use, and increase in mortality and hospitalization: an observational study using propensity score methodsEuropean Heart Journal, 2006
- Validating recommendations for coronary angiography following acute myocardial infarction in the elderlyJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2001
- Using Propensity Scores to Help Design Observational Studies: Application to the Tobacco LitigationHealth Services and Outcomes Research Methodology, 2001
- Early Revascularization in Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic ShockNew England Journal of Medicine, 1999
- Temporal Trends in Cardiogenic Shock Complicating Acute Myocardial InfarctionNew England Journal of Medicine, 1999
- Comorbidity Measures for Use with Administrative DataMedical Care, 1998
- The in-hospital development of cardiogenic shock after myocardial infarction: Incidence, predictors of occurrence, outcome and prognostic factorsJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1989
- The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effectsBiometrika, 1983