Semiparametric Methods for Evaluating the Covariate-Specific Predictiveness of Continuous Markers in Matched Case–Control Studies
- 19 February 2010
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C: Applied Statistics
- Vol. 59 (3) , 437-456
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9876.2009.00707.x
Abstract
Summary: To assess the value of a continuous marker in predicting the risk of a disease, a graphical tool called the predictiveness curve has been proposed. It characterizes the marker’s predictiveness, or capacity to stratify risk for the population, by displaying the distribution of risk endowed by the marker. Methods for making inference about the curve and for comparing curves in a general population have been developed. However, knowledge about a marker’s performance in the general population only is not enough. Since a marker’s effect on the risk model and its distribution can both differ across subpopulations, its predictiveness may vary when applied to different subpopulations. Moreover, information about the predictiveness of a marker conditional on baseline covariates is valuable for individual decision-making about having the marker measured or not. Therefore, to realize the usefulness of a risk prediction marker fully, it is important to study its performance conditional on covariates. We propose semiparametric methods for estimating covariate-specific predictiveness curves for a continuous marker. Unmatched and matched case–control study designs are accommodated. We illustrate application of the methodology by evaluating serum creatinine as a predictor of risk of renal artery stenosis.Keywords
Funding Information
- National Institutes of Health (GM-54438)
- National Cancer Institute (CA86368)
This publication has 31 references indexed in Scilit:
- Semiparametric methods for evaluating risk prediction markers in case-control studiesBiometrika, 2009
- Pivotal Evaluation of the Accuracy of a Biomarker Used for Classification or Prediction: Standards for Study DesignJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2008
- Integrating the Predictiveness of a Marker with Its Performance as a ClassifierAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 2007
- Evaluating the Predictiveness of a Continuous MarkerBiometrics, 2007
- Maximum Likelihood Estimation of Logistic Regression Parameters under Two-phase, Outcome-dependent SamplingJournal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology, 1997
- Statistics in Epidemiology: The Case-Control StudyJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1996
- Smoothing reference centile curves: The lms method and penalized likelihoodStatistics in Medicine, 1992
- Analytic methods for two‐stage case‐control studies and other stratified designsStatistics in Medicine, 1991
- Estimation of Response Probabilities from Augmented Retrospective ObservationsJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1985
- A Generalization of Sampling Without Replacement from a Finite UniverseJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1952