Rights of Non‐humans? Electronic Agents and Animals as New Actors in Politics and Law
Top Cited Papers
- 8 November 2006
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Law and Society
- Vol. 33 (4) , 497-521
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6478.2006.00368.x
Abstract
Personification of non‐humans is best understood as a strategy of dealing with the uncertainty about the identity of the other, which moves the attribution scheme from causation to double contingency and opens the space for presupposing the others' self‐referentiality. But there is no compelling reason to restrict the attribution of action exclusively to humans and to social systems, as Luhmann argues. Personifying other non‐humans is a social reality today and a political necessity for the future. The admission of actors does not take place, as Latour suggests, into one and only one collective. Rather, the properties of new actors differ extremely according to the multiplicity of different sites of the political ecology.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Incomplete Contracts Theories of the Firm and Comparative Corporate GovernanceTheoretical Inquiries in Law, 2001
- Electronic Agents and the Formation of ContractsInternational Journal of Law and Information Technology, 2001
- Persons, Things and Corporations: The Corporate Personality Controversy and Comparative Corporate GovernanceThe American Journal of Comparative Law, 1999
- Making Agency CountAmerican Behavioral Scientist, 1994
- Towards an Interaction Theory of Organizational ActorsOrganization Studies, 1992
- Der PC als InteraktionspartnerZeitschrift Fur Soziologie, 1989
- Enterprise Corporatism: New Industrial Policy and the "Essence" of the Legal PersonThe American Journal of Comparative Law, 1988
- The Prosecution and Punishment of Animals and Lifeless Things in the Middle Ages and Modern TimesUniversity of Pennsylvania Law Review and American Law Register, 1916