Early specialist repair of biliary injury
Open Access
- 2 December 2005
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in British Journal of Surgery
- Vol. 93 (2) , 216-220
- https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.5194
Abstract
Background: Considerable debate surrounds the timing of repair of injury to the common bile duct following cholecystectomy. In the absence of sepsis or significant peritoneal soiling, repair within the first week may be optimal. This study compared the outcome of early (within the first 2 weeks) and delayed (between 2 weeks and 6 months) repair. Methods: Data on all patients referred with biliary injuries were recorded prospectively. In the absence of sepsis or significant peritoneal soiling, repair was considered within 2 weeks. Results: Between November 1988 and November 2003, 123 patients were referred with injury to the biliary tree. Repair of the injury had been attempted in 55 patients (44·7 per cent) before referral. Of the 68 patients with no previous repair, nine were managed without surgery and 59 required subsequent surgical reconstruction of the ductal injury. Within the first 2 weeks after injury, 22 patients underwent primary biliary repair and three had revision of a failed biliary repair. Between 2 weeks and 6 months, a further 22 injuries were repaired. Successful repair was possible in 22 of 25 early repairs compared with 20 of 22 delayed repairs (P = 0·615). The overall operative mortality rate for patients undergoing repair was 4 per cent (two of 47 patients). Conclusion: A successful outcome was achieved in a high proportion of patients (42 of 47) when repair of the bile duct injury was undertaken in a unit experienced in the management of biliary injury. In selected patients, early repair within the first 2 weeks resulted in a similar outcome to that of delayed repair. Copyright © 2005 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.Keywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- Long-term results and risk factors influencing outcome of major bile duct injuries following cholecystectomyBritish Journal of Surgery, 2005
- Incidence and Consequence of an Hepatic Artery Injury in Patients With Postcholecystectomy Bile Duct StricturesAnnals of Surgery, 2003
- Acute bile duct injurySurgical Endoscopy, 2003
- Surgeons’ anonymous response after bile duct injury during cholecystectomyThe American Journal of Surgery, 2003
- Recognition and management of biliary complications after laparoscopic cholecystectomyAnz Journal of Surgery, 2003
- Intraoperative Cholangiography and Risk of Common Bile Duct Injury During CholecystectomyJAMA, 2003
- Changing referral pattern of biliary injuries sustained during laparoscopic cholecystectomyBritish Journal of Surgery, 2000
- Bile duct injury following laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Referral pattern and managementBritish Journal of Surgery, 1997
- Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy-Related Bile Duct InjuriesAnnals of Surgery, 1997
- Incidence and nature of bile duct injuries following laparoscopic cholecystectomy: An audit of 5913 casesBritish Journal of Surgery, 1996