A framework for conceptualizing reporting bias and its antecedents in interviews assessing human sexuality
- 1 February 1999
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in The Journal of Sex Research
- Vol. 36 (1) , 25-38
- https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499909551964
Abstract
The present paper reviews conceptual models of self‐presentation bias in interview situations that focus on assessments of human sexuality. An heuristic framework is developed that synthesizes these models to focus on self‐presentation/self‐disclosure bias as a function of emotional distress and threat to self‐esteem, both intermediate outcomes that are influenced by four general factors: Respondent, Interviewer, Task, and Contextual. Empirical research within each of these four general factors is discussed, and areas for further research are outlined.Keywords
This publication has 53 references indexed in Scilit:
- Technology, Experimentation, and the Quality of Survey DataScience, 1998
- Respondents' Understanding of the Words Used in Sexual Behavior QuestionsPublic Opinion Quarterly, 1998
- The Role of Social Desirability in Self-Reported Condom Use Attitudes and IntentionsAIDS and Behavior, 1998
- Effects of Interviewer Gender, Interviewer Choice, and Item Wording on Responses to Questions Concerning Sexual BehaviorPublic Opinion Quarterly, 1996
- Condom use in multi-ethnic neighborhoods of San Francisco: the population-based AMEN (AIDS in Multi-Ethnic Neighborhoods) Study.American Journal of Public Health, 1992
- Methodological problems in AIDS behavioral research: Influences on measurement error and participation bias in studies of sexual behavior.Psychological Bulletin, 1990
- Relationships Between Locus of Control and AnxietyJournal of Personality Assessment, 1979
- Experimenter Effects on Responses to Double-Entendre WordsJournal of Personality Assessment, 1978
- How to Ask Questions about Drinking and Sex: Response Effects in Measuring Consumer BehaviorJournal of Marketing Research, 1977
- Interpersonal attraction and attitude similarity.The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1961