Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score does not predict patient or graft survival in living donor liver transplant recipients
- 1 July 2003
- journal article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Liver Transplantation
- Vol. 9 (7) , 737-740
- https://doi.org/10.1053/jlts.2003.50122
Abstract
Although living donor liver transplantation (LDLT( is a successful procedure for most recipients, outcomes in patients who undergo transplantation as United Network for Organ Sharing status 2A are marginal. There are no published data on living donor liver transplant recipient outcomes relative to Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD( scores. Such information could be useful in living donor liver transplant recipient selection. We retrospectively analyzed all non-fulminant hepatic failure, right hepatic lobe, adult-to-adult living donor liver transplant recipients at our center between August 1997 and March 2002. We calculated MELD scores at the time of LDLT and correlated scores with 1-year patient and graft survival and hospital days during the 90-day post-LDLT period. There were 62 recipients with greater than 6 months of follow-up: 38 men, 24 women; mean age, 47.9 years; 42 white, 1 black, 17 Hispanic, and 2 Asian patients. Twenty-nine patients had hepatitis C virus infection; 4 patients, hepatitis C virus infection and alcoholic liver disease; 4 patients, alcoholic liver disease; 4 patients, cryptogenic cirrhosis; 13 patients, primary sclerosing cholangitis; 5 patients, autoimmune hepatitis; and 3 patients, primary biliary cirrhosis. Mean and median MELD scores were 15.2 and 13, respectively (range, 6 to 40(. One-year patient and graft survival were 59 of 62 patients (95%( and 52 of 62 patients (84%(, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference between median MELD scores of dead versus living patients (15 v 13; P = .15( or patients who underwent retransplantation versus those who did not (16.5 v 13; P = .30(. Mean and median hospital days in the 90-day post-LDLT period were 23.7 and 16.0 days, respectively. Living donor liver transplant recipients with a MELD score of 18 or greater had significantly more hospital days compared with recipients with a MELD score less than 18 (35.2 v 19.8 days; P = .01(. In conclusion, MELD scores did not predict post-LDLT patient or graft survival at 1 year. However, higher MELD scores (≥18( were associated with more hospital days during the 3-month post-LDLT period. (Liver Transpl 2003;9:737-740.(Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- A correlation between the pretransplantation MELD score and mortality in the first two years after liver transplantationLiver Transplantation, 2003
- The new liver allocation system: Moving toward evidence-based transplantation policyLiver Transplantation, 2002
- Adult-to-Adult Transplantation of the Right Hepatic Lobe from a Living DonorNew England Journal of Medicine, 2002
- Right-liver living donor transplantation for decompensated end-stage liver diseaseLiver Transplantation, 2002
- Model for end-stage liver disease and Child-Turcotte-Pugh score as predictors of pretransplantation disease severity, posttransplantation outcome, and resource utilization in United Network for Organ Sharing status 2A patientsLiver Transplantation, 2002
- Adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation using right-lobe grafts: Results and lessons learned from a single-center experienceLiver Transplantation, 2001
- MELD and PELD: Application of survival models to liver allocationLiver Transplantation, 2001
- A Model to Predict Survival in Patients With End–Stage Liver DiseaseHepatology, 2001
- Biliary anastomosis in living related liver transplantation using the right liver lobe: Techniques and complicationsLiver Transplantation, 2000
- A model to predict poor survival in patients undergoing transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shuntsHepatology, 2000