The Effects of Distributive and Procedural Justice on Performance
- 1 March 1999
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in The Journal of Psychology
- Vol. 133 (2) , 183-193
- https://doi.org/10.1080/00223989909599732
Abstract
Findings of this experimental study indicate that unfair distributive justice perceptions resulted in increased feelings of anger, as predicted by equity theory, although emotional state did not influence task performance. Providing the participants with procedural justice by allowing them a voice in the decision process did not affect their performance, but providing interactional justice by explaining why specific consequences were received did improve their subsequent task performance.Keywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- SOME TESTS OF THE SELF-INTEREST AND GROUP-VALUE MODELS OF PROCEDURAL JUSTICE: EVIDENCE FROM AN ORGANIZATIONAL APPEAL PROCEDURE.The Academy of Management Journal, 1993
- The Perceived Fairness of Selection Systems: An Organizational Justice PerspectiveAcademy of Management Review, 1993
- EFFECTS OF PROCEDURAL AND DISTRIBUTIVE JUSTICE ON REACTIONS TO PAY RAISE DECISIONS.The Academy of Management Journal, 1989
- VOICE AND JUSTIFICATION: THEIR INFLUENCE ON PROCEDURAL FAIRNESS JUDGMENTS.The Academy of Management Journal, 1988
- The role of procedural and distributive justice in organizational behaviorSocial Justice Research, 1987
- Procedural Justice and ParticipationHuman Relations, 1985
- Impact of personal control on performance: Is added control always beneficial?Journal of Applied Psychology, 1982
- Correlates of employee reactions to performance appraisals and appraisal systems.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1981
- Distributive and procedural justice: Combined impact of voice and improvement on experienced inequity.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1977
- Inequity In Social ExchangeAdvances in Experimental Social Psychology, 1965