Understanding ‘Occupation’ as the Founders Did

1 November 1995

journal article
research article
Published by SAGE Publications in British Journal of Occupational Therapy

Vol. 58 (11) , 458-460
https://doi.org/10.1177/030802269505801102

Abstract

The term ‘occupation’ is both ambiguous and encompassing. This term was adopted by the founders of the profession as a means of incorporating a variety of perspectives on the profession. Interrelating concepts deriving from pragmatism and the mental hygiene movement offer a rationale for understanding occupation. Terms used to describe occupation are egocentricity (mind/body elements), exocentricity (time/space elements) and consensuality (social elements). The integration of these aspects in occupation offers an explanation for the holism advanced by the profession at its outset and today.

Keywords

This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:

Genesis of Occupation: A Philosophical Model for Therapy and Theory
Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 2010
Occupational Therapist or Activity Therapist – Which Do You Choose to Be?
American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 1994
Classification and study in occupation a review and discussion of taxonomies
Journal of Occupational Science, 1994
Occupational Adaptation: Toward a Holistic Approach for Contemporary Practice, Part 1
American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 1992
Occupational Science: Academic Innovation in the Service of Occupational Therapy’s Future
American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 1991
Occupation: Form and Performance
American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 1988
Eleanor Clarke Slagle
Occupational Therapy in Mental Health, 1985
Another Look at Occupational Therapy's History
Occupational Therapy in Mental Health, 1985
The Mental Hygiene Movement, the Development of Personality and the School: The Medicalization of American Education
History of Education Quarterly, 1983
A Model of Human Occupation, Part 1. Conceptual Framework and Content
American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 1980