Iomeprol and iopamidol in cardiac angiography: a randomised, double-blind, parallel-group comparison
- 31 May 1994
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Elsevier in European Journal of Radiology
- Vol. 18, S61-S66
- https://doi.org/10.1016/0720-048x(94)90095-7
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Use of nonionic or low osmolar contrast agents in cardiovascular proceduresJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1993
- A Comparison of Nonionic, Low-Osmolality Radiocontrast Agents with Ionic, High-Osmolality Agents during Cardiac CatheterizationNew England Journal of Medicine, 1992
- Safety and Cost Effectiveness of High-Osmolality as Compared with Low-Osmolality Contrast Material in Patients Undergoing Cardiac AngiographyNew England Journal of Medicine, 1992
- Randomized comparison of the cost and effectiveness of iopamidol and diatrizoate as contrast agents for cardiac angiographyJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1990
- The Effects of Radiographic Contrast Media on Myocardial Contractility and Coronary ResistanceInvestigative Radiology, 1990
- Effect of Sodium Addition to Non-Ionic Contrast Media on Cardiac Contractile ForceActa Radiologica, 1990
- Coronary arteriography 1984–1987: A report of the registry of the society for cardiac angiography and interventions. I. Results and complicationsCatheterization and Cardiovascular Diagnosis, 1989
- Effect of calcium-binding additives on ventricular fibrillation and repolarization changes during coronary angiographyJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1987
- Ventricular fibrillation during coronary angiography in dogs: The role of calcium-binding additivesThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1984
- The Influence of Hyperosmolality on Left Ventricular Contractile StateInvestigative Radiology, 1980