A Comparison of Nonionic, Low-Osmolality Radiocontrast Agents with Ionic, High-Osmolality Agents during Cardiac Catheterization
Open Access
- 13 February 1992
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Massachusetts Medical Society in New England Journal of Medicine
- Vol. 326 (7) , 431-436
- https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199202133260702
Abstract
Nonionic, low-osmolality radiocontrast agents are used frequently because they are believed to be safer than ionic, high-osmolality agents, but they are also more expensive. We conducted a randomized trial to compare the incidence of adverse events after the administration of ionic, high-osmolality and of nonionic, low-osmolality radiocontrast agents during cardiac angiography.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Organized Medicine and the Assessment of TechnologyNew England Journal of Medicine, 1990
- Randomized comparison of the cost and effectiveness of iopamidol and diatrizoate as contrast agents for cardiac angiographyJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1990
- Safety of cardiac angiography with conventional ionic contrast agentsThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1990
- Thrombotic and cardiovascular complications related to nonionic contrast media during cardiac catheterization: Analysis of 8,517 patientsThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1990
- Quality assessment of randomized controlled trials of contrast media.Radiology, 1989
- Results of randomized controlled trials of low-versus high-osmolality contrast media.Radiology, 1989
- Contrast media-related complications during cardiac catheterization using HexabrixTM or RenografinTM in high-risk patientsThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1988
- Effect of calcium-binding additives on ventricular fibrillation and repolarization changes during coronary angiographyJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1987
- Ventricular fibrillation during coronary angiography: Reduced incidence in man with contrast media lacking calcium binding additivesCatheterization and Cardiovascular Diagnosis, 1985
- Comparison of an Ionic with a Nonionic Contrast Agent for Cardiac AngiographyInvestigative Radiology, 1985