The size distribution of insertions and deletions in human and rodent pseudogenes suggests the logarithmic gap penalty for sequence alignment
- 1 April 1995
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Journal of Molecular Evolution
- Vol. 40 (4) , 464-473
- https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00164032
Abstract
The size distributions of deletions, insertions, and indels (i.e., insertions or deletions) were studied, using 78 human processed pseudogenes and other published data sets. The following results were obtained: (1) Deletions occur more frequently than do insertions in sequence evolution; none of the pseudogenes studied shows significantly more insertions than deletions. (2) Empirically, the size distributions of deletions, insertions, and indels can be described well by a power law, i.e., f k = Ck −b , where f k is the frequency of deletion, insertion, or indel with gap length k, b is the power parameter, and C is the normalization factor. (3) The estimates of b for deletions and insertions from the same data set are approximately equal to each other, indicating that the size distributions for deletions and insertions are approximately identical. (4) The variation in the estimates of b among various data sets is small, indicating that the effect of local structure exists but only plays a secondary role in the size distribution of deletions and insertions. (5) The linear gap penalty, which is most commonly used in sequence alignment, is not supported by our analysis; rather, the power law for the size distribution of indels suggests that an appropriate gap penalty is w k = a + b ln k, where a is the gap creation cost and blnk is the gap extension cost. (6) The higher frequency of deletion over insertion suggests that the gap creation cost of insertion (a i ) should be larger than that of deletion (a d ); that is, a i − a d = In R, where R is the frequency ratio of deletions to insertions.Keywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comparative analysis of multiple protein-sequence alignment methods.Molecular Biology and Evolution, 1994
- Analysis of insertions/deletions in protein structuresJournal of Molecular Biology, 1992
- An evolutionary model for maximum likelihood alignment of DNA sequencesJournal of Molecular Evolution, 1991
- Gene deletions causing human genetic disease: mechanisms of mutagenesis and the role of the local DNA sequence environmentHuman Genetics, 1991
- [22] Three-way Needleman—Wunsch algorithmPublished by Elsevier ,1990
- Deletions in processed pseudogenes accumulate faster in rodents than in humansJournal of Molecular Evolution, 1989
- Evaluation and improvements in the automatic alignment of protein sequencesProtein Engineering, Design and Selection, 1987
- PROCESSED PSEUDOGENES: CHARACTERISTICS AND EVOLUTIONAnnual Review of Genetics, 1985
- Optimal sequence alignmentsProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 1983
- Similar Amino Acid Sequences: Chance or Common Ancestry?Science, 1981