Mortality with upper gastrointestinal bleeding and perforation: effects of time and NSAID use
Open Access
- 5 June 2009
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in BMC Gastroenterology
- Vol. 9 (1) , 41
- https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-230x-9-41
Abstract
Some people who suffer an upper gastrointestinal bleed or perforation die. The mortality rate was estimated at 12% in studies published before 1997, but a systematic survey of more recent data is needed. Better treatment is likely to have reduced mortality. An estimate of mortality is helpful in explaining to patients the risks of therapy, especially with NSAIDs. A systematic review of studies published before 1997, and between 1997 and 2008. Any study architecture was acceptable if it reported on cases who died from any cause of upper gastrointestinal bleed or perforation. Analyses were conducted separately for all cases, and those prescribed NSAID or aspirin. Information was available for 61,067 cases (81% published since 1997) of whom 5,001 died. The mortality rate in all cases fell significantly, from 11.6% (95% confidence interval, 11.0 to 12.2) in pre-1997 studies to 7.4% (7.2 to 7.6) in those published since 1997. In 5,526 patients taking NSAID or aspirin, mortality increased, from 14.7% (13.6 to 15.8) before 1997 to 20.9% (18.8 to 22.9) since 1997. Upper gastrointestinal bleed or perforation still carries a finite risk of death. Differences in study architecture, population characteristics, risk factors, definition of mortality, and reporting of outcomes impose limitations on interpreting effect size. Data published since 1997 suggest that mortality in patients suffering from an upper gastrointestinal bleed or perforation has fallen to 1 in 13 overall, but remains higher at about 1 in 5 in those exposed to NSAID or aspirin.Keywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Eighteen Year (1985–2002) Analysis of Incidence, Mortality, and Cardiac Procedure Outcomes of Acute Myocardial Infarction in Patients ≥ 65 Years of AgeThe American Journal of Cardiology, 2008
- What do we know about communicating risk? A brief review and suggestion for contextualising serious, but rare, risk, and the example of cox-2 selective and non-selective NSAIDsArthritis Research & Therapy, 2008
- ‘Real-life’ reduction in cholesterol with statins, 1993 to 2002British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 2008
- Incidence of Epidural Hematoma, Infection, and Neurologic Injury in Obstetric Patients with Epidural Analgesia/AnesthesiaAnesthesiology, 2006
- The Outcome of Suspected Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding With 24-Hour Access to Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: A Prospective Cohort StudyEndoscopy, 2006
- Time Trends of Ischemic Stroke Incidence and Mortality in Patients Diagnosed With First Atrial Fibrillation in 1980 to 2000Stroke, 2005
- Searching one or two databases was insufficient for meta-analysis of observational studiesJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2005
- Quantitative estimation of rare adverse events which follow a biological progression: a new model applied to chronic NSAID usePAIN®, 2000
- Size is everything – large amounts of information are needed to overcome random effects in estimating direction and magnitude of treatment effectsPain, 1998
- A Review on Treatment of Bleeding Peptic Ulcer: A Collaborative Task of Gastroenterologist and SurgeonScandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology, 1996