How Reliable are TOEFL Scores?
- 1 October 1997
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Educational and Psychological Measurement
- Vol. 57 (5) , 741-758
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164497057005002
Abstract
The reliability of scores on four forms of the Test of English as a Foreign Language (TOEFL) was estimated using a hybrid IRT model. It was found that there was very little difference between their overall reliability when the testlet items were assumed to be independent and when their dependence was modeled. A larger difference in reliability was found when test sections were analyzed individually. Then we found as much as a 40% overestimate in reading comprehension testlets, with the longer testlets of the newest form of TOEFL showing the most local dependence. The listening comprehension testlets exhibited much less local dependence. We also found that the test was unidimensional enough for the use of univariate item response theory (IRT) to be efficacious, and that the reading comprehension testlets showed essentially no differential functioning by sex.Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Are Tests Comprising Both Multiple‐Choice and Free‐Response Items Necessarily Less Unidimensional Than Multiple‐Choice Tests?An Analysis of Two TestsJournal of Educational Measurement, 1994
- On the Reliability of Testlet‐Based TestsJournal of Educational Measurement, 1991
- Understanding ReliabilityEducational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 1991
- On the Sampling Theory Roundations of Item Response Theory ModelsPsychometrika, 1990
- Trace Lines for Testlets: A Use of Multiple‐Categorical‐Response ModelsJournal of Educational Measurement, 1989
- TECHNICAL GUIDELINES FOR ASSESSING COMPUTERIZED ADAPTIVE TESTSJournal of Educational Measurement, 1984
- Estimating Item Parameters and Latent Ability when Responses are Scored in Two or More Nominal CategoriesPsychometrika, 1972
- Note on the Reliability of a Test: A Reply to Dr. Crum's Criticism.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1924
- Note on the Reliability of a Test, with Special Reference to the Examinations Set by the College Entrance BoardThe American Mathematical Monthly, 1923
- Note on the Use of Spearman's Prophecy Formula for Reliability.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1923