Diagnostic Accuracy of the Cognitive Levels Test, the KeyMath-Revised, and the Woodcock Reading Mastery Tests-Revised
- 1 April 1992
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Diagnostique
- Vol. 17 (3) , 163-175
- https://doi.org/10.1177/153450849201700301
Abstract
Sixty-six regular classroom children and 52 children with learning disabilities were administered the Cognitive Levels Test (CLT), the KeyMath-Revised (KMR), and the Woodcock Reading Mastery Tests-Revised (WRMTR). For both groups, correlations between the CLT and WRMTR scores were found to be higher than those typically found in the literature for cognitive and reading measures. For both groups, correlations between the CLT and KMR scores were also higher than those commonly found in the literature for cognitive and math measures. With regard to differences between means, 70% of the CLT-achievement differences were significant for the learning disabled group. For the regular classroom group, only 3% of the CLT-achievement differences were significant. Overall, 81% of the combined subjects were correctly classified using the three-instrument battery.Keywords
This publication has 4 references indexed in Scilit:
- Cognition and academic achievement: The relationship of the Cognitive Levels Test, the Keymath Revised, and the Woodcock Reading Mastery Tests-RevisedPsychology in the Schools, 1990
- Cognition and Academic Achievement: The Relationship of the Cognitive Levels Test to the Keymath and Woodcock Reading Mastery TestsEducational and Psychological Measurement, 1989
- An Evaluation of the Identification of Learning Disabled Students in ColoradoLearning Disability Quarterly, 1983
- Declaring Students Eligible for Learning Disability Services: Why Bother with the Data?Learning Disability Quarterly, 1982