Multicenter trial of ionic versus nonionic contrast media for cardiac angiography
- 1 October 1993
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Elsevier in The American Journal of Cardiology
- Vol. 72 (11) , 770-775
- https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9149(93)91061-l
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Nephrotoxicity of high-osmolality versus low-osmolality contrast media: randomized clinical trial.Radiology, 1992
- A Comparison of Nonionic, Low-Osmolality Radiocontrast Agents with Ionic, High-Osmolality Agents during Cardiac CatheterizationNew England Journal of Medicine, 1992
- Safety and Cost Effectiveness of High-Osmolality as Compared with Low-Osmolality Contrast Material in Patients Undergoing Cardiac AngiographyNew England Journal of Medicine, 1992
- Safety of cardiac angiography with conventional ionic contrast agentsThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1990
- Thrombotic and cardiovascular complications related to nonionic contrast media during cardiac catheterization: Analysis of 8,517 patientsThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1990
- Adverse reactions to ionic and nonionic contrast media. A report from the Japanese Committee on the Safety of Contrast Media.Radiology, 1990
- Cardiovascular and Renal Toxicity of a Nonionic Radiographic Contrast Agent after Cardiac CatheterizationAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1989
- The R.A.C.R. Survey of Intravenous Contrast Media Reactions A Preliminary ReportAustralasian Radiology, 1988
- Clinical superiority of a new nonionic contrast agent (iopamidol) for cardiac angiographyJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1985
- Benefits of Nonionic Contrast in Coronary Arteriography Preliminary Results of a Randomized Double-Blind Trial Comparing Iopamidol with Renografin-76Investigative Radiology, 1984