Bioprosthetic and mechanical valves in the elderly: Benefits and risks
- 1 August 1995
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in The Annals of Thoracic Surgery
- Vol. 60, S443-S446
- https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-4975(95)00252-g
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Comparison of Outcomes in Men 11 Years after Heart-Valve Replacement with a Mechanical Valve or BioprosthesisNew England Journal of Medicine, 1993
- Durability of porcine valves at fifteen years in a representative North American patient populationThe Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 1992
- Twelve-Year Comparison of a Bjork–Shiley Mechanical Heart Valve with Porcine BioprosthesesNew England Journal of Medicine, 1991
- Ten-year experience with aortic valve replacement in 482 patients 70 years of age or older: Operative risk and long-term resultsThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 1990
- Fifteen-Year Experience with 1678 Hancock Porcine Bioprosthetic Heart Valve ReplacementsAnnals of Surgery, 1989
- Aortic valve replacement with the Hancock standard, Björk-Shiley, and Lillehei-Kaster prosthesesThe Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 1989
- Guidelines for Reporting Morbidity and Mortality after Cardiac Valvular OperationsThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 1988
- Carpentier-Edwards Standard Porcine Bioprosthesis: Primary Tissue Failure (Structural Valve Deterioration) by Age GroupsThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 1988