A Comparison of Methods for Sampling Ants (Hymenoptera, Formicidae) in Savannas
- 30 November 1989
- journal article
- research article
- Published by JSTOR in Biotropica
- Vol. 21 (4) , 348-352
- https://doi.org/10.2307/2388285
Abstract
Hand collecting of ants, sampling all ants in a specific area, and collection with pitfall traps baited with meat, tuna, honey, or with unbaited traps were compared with respect to efficiency in assessing species diversity and abundance in eight different localities in the Venezuelan Llanos. Hand collecting for over 8 hr was the most time-efficient and reliable technique for estimating the number of species. Intensive sampling of ants in a small area proved to be the least efficient method. Each of the techniques sampled a somewhat different set of ant species. The best results were obtained by a combination of hand collecting and pitfall traps. Abundance was better measured by the number of collection sites where the species occurred rather than by the number of the individuals collected.This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Theories and Models of Species AbundanceThe American Naturalist, 1986
- Diversity and Distribution of Ant Communities in Puerto RicoBiotropica, 1984
- Seasonal, Annual, and Among‐site Variation in the Ground Ant Community of a Deciduous Tropical Forest: Some Causes of Patchy Species DistributionsEcological Monographs, 1983
- Precision of Several Sampling Techniques for Foraging Red Imported Fire Ant (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) Workers in Cotton Fields1Journal of Economic Entomology, 1983
- Partitioning of Space in Communities of AntsJournal of Animal Ecology, 1979
- Some effects of vegetation cover and disturbance on a tropical ant faunaInsectes Sociaux, 1977
- A Comparison Of The Hylean And Congo-West African Rain Forest Ant Faunas1973