A comparison of several analytical techniques for prediction of relative stability of fats and oils to oxidation
- 1 April 1962
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Oil & Fat Industries
- Vol. 39 (4) , 226-229
- https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02635826
Abstract
Three analytical methods proposed by various workers for predicting the relative stability of fats and oils to oxidation have been compared on a series of samples. The Eckey Oxygen Absorption, the modification of the A.S.T.M. Oxygen Bomb (4), and the Active Oxygen Method (AOM) were applied to combinations of animal and vegetable fats and oils, with and without added monoglycerides and antioxidants. The results indicate that the Eckey Oxygen Absorption and modified ASTM Oxygen Bomb methods are more precise than the AOM method, and more in keeping with the experience in the fat and oil field in relation to actual performance stability than the AOM. Experimental relationships of these factors and methods to shelf life storage studies measured organoleptically will be the subject of a later paper.This publication has 3 references indexed in Scilit:
- A comparison of commercially used phenolic antioxidants in edible animal fatsJournal of Oil & Fat Industries, 1955
- An oxygen-absorption method for examination of fatJournal of Oil & Fat Industries, 1946
- An accelerated stability test using the peroxide value as an indexJournal of Oil & Fat Industries, 1933