Left Ventricular‐Based Cardiac Stimulation Post AV Nodal Ablation Evaluation (The PAVE Study)
Top Cited Papers
- 14 September 2005
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology
- Vol. 16 (11) , 1160-1165
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8167.2005.50062.x
Abstract
Background: Chronic right ventricular pacing has been reported to promote cardiac dyssynchrony. The PAVE trial prospectively compared chronic biventricular pacing to right ventricular pacing in patients undergoing ablation of the AV node for management of atrial fibrillation with rapid ventricular rates. Methods and Results: One hundred and eighty‐four patients requiring AV node ablation were randomized to receive a biventricular pacing system (n = 103) or a right ventricular pacing system (n = 81). The study endpoints were change in the 6‐minute hallway walk test, quality of life, and left ventricular ejection fraction. Patient characteristics were similar (64% male; age: 69 ± 10 years, ejection fraction: 0.46 ± 0.16; 83%, NYHA Class II or III). At 6 months postablation, patients treated with cardiac resynchronization had a significant improvement in 6‐minute walk distance, (31%) above baseline (82.9 ± 94.7 m), compared to patients receiving right ventricular pacing, (24%) above baseline (61.2 ± 90.0 m) (P = 0.04). There were no significant differences in the quality‐of‐life parameters. At 6 months postablation, the ejection fraction in the biventricular group (0.46 ± 0.13) was significantly greater in comparison to patients receiving right ventricular pacing (0.41 ± 0.13, P = 0.03). Patients with an ejection fraction ≤45% or with NYHA Class II/III symptoms receiving a biventricular pacemaker appear to have a greater improvement in 6‐minute walk distance compared to patients with normal systolic function or Class I symptoms. Conclusion: For patients undergoing AV node ablation for atrial fibrillation, biventricular pacing provides a significant improvement in the 6‐minute hallway walk test and ejection fraction compared to right ventricular pacing. These beneficial effects of cardiac resynchronization appear to be greater in patients with impaired systolic function or with symptomatic heart failure.Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Short-Term Effects of Right-Left Heart Sequential Cardiac Resynchronization in Patients With Heart Failure, Chronic Atrial Fibrillation, and Atrioventricular Nodal BlockCirculation, 2004
- Cardiac-Resynchronization Therapy with or without an Implantable Defibrillator in Advanced Chronic Heart FailureNew England Journal of Medicine, 2004
- Combined Cardiac Resynchronization and Implantable Cardioversion Defibrillation in Advanced Chronic Heart FailureJAMA, 2003
- Cardiac Resynchronization in Chronic Heart FailureNew England Journal of Medicine, 2002
- Cardiac resynchronization in patients with congestive heart failure and chronic atrial fibrillationJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 2002
- Long-Term Survival after Ablation of the Atrioventricular Node and Implantation of a Permanent Pacemaker in Patients with Atrial FibrillationNew England Journal of Medicine, 2001
- Effects of Multisite Biventricular Pacing in Patients with Heart Failure and Intraventricular Conduction DelayNew England Journal of Medicine, 2001
- Long-Term Effect of Right Ventricular Pacing on Myocardial Perfusion and FunctionJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1997
- Alterations in left ventricular relaxation during atrioventricular pacing in humansJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1990