Effects of Centrifugal, Axial, and Pulsatile Left Ventricular Assist Device Support on End-Organ Function in Heart Failure Patients
- 1 April 2009
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation
- Vol. 28 (4) , 352-359
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healun.2009.01.005
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- Use of a Continuous-Flow Device in Patients Awaiting Heart TransplantationNew England Journal of Medicine, 2007
- End-organ Function in Patients on Long-term Circulatory Support With Continuous- or Pulsatile-flow Assist DevicesThe Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation, 2007
- Peripheral Vascular Reactivity in Patients With Pulsatile vs Axial Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device SupportThe Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation, 2006
- First Clinical Implant of the VentrAssist Left Ventricular Assist System as Destination Therapy for End-Stage Heart FailureThe Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation, 2005
- Cellular and Hemodynamics Responses of Failing Myocardium to Continuous Flow Mechanical Circulatory Support Using the DeBakey-Noon Left Ventricular Assist Device: a Comparative Analysis With Pulsatile-Type DevicesThe Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation, 2005
- Circulatory Support for Long-Term Treatment of Heart FailureCirculation, 2002
- Long-Term Use of a Left Ventricular Assist Device for End-Stage Heart FailureNew England Journal of Medicine, 2001
- Renal Circulation and Cellular Metabolism During Left Ventricular Assisted Circulation: Comparison Study of Pulsatile and Nonpulsatile AssistsArtificial Organs, 1997
- The Role of Pulsatility in End-Organ Microcirculation After Cardiogenic ShockAsaio Journal, 1996
- Prediction of Creatinine Clearance from Serum CreatinineNephron, 1976